Marvin Moeller vs Matthew Dellavedova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Moeller's second serve compare to Dellavedova's? Moeller has a recent second serve win rate of 40.22%, while Dellavedova achieves 44%. This performance indicator is closely associated with match outcomes.
• What edge does Moeller have in return games? Moeller has won 46.62% of opponent's second serve points in recent times, compared to Dellavedova's 42.56%.
• Comparing their first serve return success, Moeller has a slight advantage, returning 28.83% compared to Dellavedova's 27.92%.
• When under pressure, Moeller saves breakpoints 55.28% of the time, while Dellavedova saves 51.16%. This can be pivotal during crucial match moments.
• In annual match wins, Moeller has won 61.54% of matches, narrowly surpassing Dellavedova's 59.78% win rate.
• Which surface do they perform best on? Moeller thrives on indoor hard courts with a 65% win rate, whereas Dellavedova excels on hard courts at 57%.
• Regarding event level performance, both players have notable success rates on the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K circuit, with Moeller winning 70.27% and Dellavedova 71.93% of their matches.
• Opponent quality differs slightly, with Moeller competing against players of an average rank of 407.31 and Dellavedova facing a stronger average rank of 363.75.
• If a deciding set arises, Dellavedova has a higher success rate at 77%, compared to Moeller's 67%, potentially indicating resilience in such scenarios.
• In terms of converting breakpoints, Dellavedova stands out with a recent conversion rate of 36.07%, slightly better than Moeller's 33.58%.

Editorial Prediction (June 20, 2025, UTC):

Based on recent second serve performance, Dellavedova holds a slight advantage, which is crucial for predicting match outcomes. Additionally, Dellavedova demonstrates stronger breakpoint conversion rates, providing them an edge in critical moments.

Moeller shows strength in return games, especially against opponents' second serves, giving them an opportunity to stay competitive throughout the match. However, their lower breakpoint conversion rate may limit capitalizing on opportunities.

Surface preference indicates Moeller performs better on indoor hard surfaces, whereas Dellavedova excels on hard courts where the match is likely to be played. Furthermore, Dellavedova's higher staying power in deciding sets suggests a promising edge in prolonged encounters.

Given these comparative stats, Dellavedova is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match, considering their slight but crucial advantages in key areas.